BOGUS CARTEL (LACSON’S APPARITION OF EVIDENCE)

Nothing hurts like hell when Juan dela Cruz is again dumbfounded by Senator Lacson’s another pre-orchestrated “I know all” speech.

First, it was FG with Eduardo de Luna, owner of EC de Luna Cons (EDLC) blacklisted by the WB for supposed collusion. Prime evidence supporting this claim is the 200 “liesblower” – Eugenio “Udong” Mahusay.

Mahusay was supposed to spill the beans about Jose Pidal but what the Filipinos got was a mockery trial. The supposed Senate inquest proceedings on Pidal led nowhere.

And now, another debacle heading the same direction; as Ping tries to link FG and de Luna using the “bible truth” utterly recanted and refuted by its very author- Mahusay. This bible comes in the form of a personal appointment book of the still faceless Jose Pidal

So for augment sake let’s say Jose Pidal met with de Luna. How would that link with FG? The 4-year drag of Pidal investigations were nowhere near the truth, in fact it was solely remembered as the Hulk speech of Lacson which controversy and hype got him in the 2007 Senatorial ballots.

To use the same evidence on FG-de Luna link and to the suppose graft of the Arroyos is “like fishing on dead creek”. Lacson is using immaterial proof to rekindle the friction between him and Arroyos.

And “danrada!”, another set of haunting witnesses that would support FG-de Luna “twosome” collusion. These are composed of 10 ghost eyewitnesses whom Lacson is unable to drag in the open.

Aside from being faceless, these other set of live evidence Ping has are utterly nameless and almost inexistent.

And as predicted, if these supposed witnesses come to light, they would only be available in the Senate floor where of course Lacson does his tango in front of live television feeds.

Not in the Philippine courts of tribunals but on pure prank of trial by publicity.

How many inquests are there in the Upper House? To name a few, they are the Pidal, Bolante, Lozada, Euro gens, and now ECDLC collusion. All but one is incriminating FG and “advented” by Lacson’s hour-long privilege.

These floor proceedings gave more than favourable air time for honchos to throw media mileage to themselves...A free-campaign for 2010 presidential contenders that got tired of the going-to-the-drain CHA-CHA appeal.

Appealing for what is fair and tangible should first and foremost involve the query on why the WB had been withholding their supposed inquest and evidence against the ECDLC collusion.

Just for a thought, ECDLC was deprived of the WB-NRIMP-1 projects package in 2002-2003 of its cited high bid price. But records show that WB projects subjected for bidding over the same period is of same and else higher bid prices?

There is nothing but ”gray area” with the WB-ECDLC arena than supposed black-and-white.

And ironically, this huge space of doubt in WB’s inquest and decision of denying the ECDLC in its bids was further exploited by honking solons who have wanted to inflict just the right havoc for the state to panic and the presidency to turn vulnerable for a power-grab.

Nothing in this world is certain. No one is infallible even the WB.

What if there were no presentations of facts because there is nothing material and substantive enough to present?

What if this FG-de Luna partnership in crime is another set of Lacson’s bogus cartel brought by personal gripe?

Facts point that Lacson had long wanted the presidency but was denied of it more than once. And that as early as last year, his out racing amongst presidential wannabees for popularity surveys.

Truth is, Sen Ping Lacson was the right-hand-man of convicted plundered Joseph “Erap” Estrada- the one who had not serve a day behind bars after the ruling of an irrevocable “guilty” verdict.

Evidence leads Lacson had not come clean with the cases of in human practices he had supposedly committed. Tracing back, he was the PNP Chief and Commander of the police officials who escaped trial on the Dacer-Corbito case but washed his hands clean by saying “I had no idea”.

Lacson was too eager denying allegiance or even knowledge of the Dacer slay or to ERAP’s multi-million plunder then, so what makes his accusations and evidence worthy of people’ interest now?

PING was blind of the true-blue crimes that were done right under his nose.

Who could tell if the Senate “fault-dog” (Lacson) is not merely sniffing his own stench? Are we going to fall for his politicking over and again?